Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of anti-malarial treatment efficacy between PLHIV and HIV-uninfected malaria patients

From: Efficacy of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) in people living with HIV (PLHIV) diagnosed with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Africa: a WWARN systematic review

Study ID

Malaria drug

HIV drug

N: HIV-

Event HIV-

N: HIV + 

Event HIV + 

Day

Statistics

Type of analysis

Comparison HIV (−) to HIV (+) Estimate

95%CI

P-value

Recrudescence

 3

ASAQ

TS, ARTa

250

9b

34

0

28

HRc

Univariable

N/A

 

0.25

 11

AL

EVF + LPV/r + NVP

181

5d

181

6d

28

ORe

Univariable

0.83

0.20–3.33

1

 12

AL or SP

None

530

61

266

37

45

RR

Multivariable controlled for treatment

0.85

0.58–1.23

0.38

Recurrence

 3

ASAQ

TS, ART

250

33

34

1

28

HR2

Univariable

1.75

 

0.08

5

DP

TS, NVPf

705

N/A

276

N/A

42

HR

Univariable

1.75

 

0.001

AL

TS, NVPf

699

N/A

333

N/A

42

HR

Univariable

1.51

 

0.002

 11

AL

EFV

181

88

50

19

28

OR

Multivariable controlled for day 7 lumefantrine concentration

2.84

1.04–7.78

0.04

 

AL

EFV

181

88

50

19

28

OR

Multivariable

1.73

0.73–4.11

0.21

 

AL

EFV

181

88

50

19

28

OR

Univariable

1.87

0.86–4.06

0.11

 15

AL

EFV

30

4

9

3

42

OR

Univariable

0.31

0.05–1.75

0.319

 11

AL

LPV/r

181

88

70

10

28

OR

Multivariable controlled for day 7 lumefantrine concentration

5.03

1.58–15.98

0.006

 

AL

LPV/r

181

88

70

10

28

OR

Multivariable

6.48

2.18–19.21

0.0008

 

AL

LPV/r

181

88

70

10

28

OR

Univariable

6.32

2.23–17.95

0.0005

 

AL

NVP

181

88

61

19

28

OR

Multivariable controlled for day 7 lumefantrine concentration

2.22

1.10–4.48

0.03

 

AL

NVP

181

88

61

19

28

OR

Multivariable

2.27

1.12–4.60

0.02

 

AL

NVP

181

88

61

19

28

OR

Univariable

2.36

1.21–4.58

0.01

19

AL

NVP (1 EFV)g

99

12

68

12

28

OR

Univariable

0.64

0.27–1.53

0.317

12

AL or SP

None

530

86

266

49

45

RR

Multivariable controlled for treatment

0.89

0.65–1.22

0.45

6

AL

TS, ARTh

2371

774

533

128

28

HRb

Univariable

1.55

 

NA

 

DP

TS, ARTh

2176

153

484

29

28

HRb

Univariable

1

 

NA

 

AL

TS, ARTh

2371

N/A

533

N/A

42

HRb

Univariable

1.9

 

NA

 

DP

TS, ARTh

2176

N/A

484

N/A

42

HRb

Univariable

1.18

 

NA

 

AL

TS, ARTh

2371

N/A

533

N/A

84

HRb

Univariable

2.02

 

NA

 

DP

TS, ARTh

2176

N/A

484

N/A

84

HRb

Univariable

2.07

 

NA

New infection

 12

AL or SP

None

530

25

266

12

45

RR

Multivariable controlled for treatment

1.04

0.53–2.04

0.89

  1. AL artemether-lumefantrine, ART antiretroviral therapy, ASAQ artesunate-amodiaquine, DP dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine, EFV efavirenz, HR hazard ratio, LPV/r lopinavir/ritonavir, N/A information not available, NVP nevirapine, SP sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, TS trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylactic treatment, OR odds ratio, RR relative risk
  2. aChildren meeting WHO eligibility criteria received ART (Zidovudine)
  3. bCalculated from KM estimates, HR estimated using the formula by Klein et al. [19]. KM estimates either provided in text or extracted from the figure
  4. cCould not be calculated as no recurrences were observed in the PLHIV group
  5. dBased on genotyping results for 96% of recurrences, assuming recurrences with missing PCR were reinfections
  6. eCalculated from raw numbers provided in the article, assuming 4% of recurrences with missing PCR were reinfections
  7. fIncludes PLHIV and patients exposed to HIV (DP: 71 infected, 64 on NVP; AL: 101 infected, 94 on NVP)
  8. gAll PLHIV were identified through attendance at a weekly clinic in which all received NVP (except for a single patient on efavirenz; when this patient was excluded from the analysis, the relationship between NVP use and lumefantrine concentration on day 7 remained significant)
  9. hTS includes also patients exposed to HIV who were randomly assigned to TS