Skip to main content

Table 3 EBPAS subscales, item means, standard deviations, item–average correlations, and Cronbach’s alpha for acceptability of PreVent intervention among midwives at Kisenyi Health facility

From: Video-based education messaging to enhance optimal uptake of malaria preventive therapy in pregnant women: a mixed methods study involving pregnant women and midwives in Uganda

EBPAS subscales and total

Mean

SD

Average interitem correlation

α

1. Requirements

17

11

0.22

0.36

Agency (institution regulations) required

4.7

0.5

1

 

Supervisor required

1

0

0.22

 

State (country regulation) required

2.8

1.2

1

 

2. Appeal

26

5.4

− 0.07

0.4

Intervention makes sense

5

0

0

 

intuitively appealing

4.7

0.5

− 0.46

 

Colleagues happy with the intervention

4.7

0.5

0

 

Enough training

3

3.7

0.25

 

3. Openness

22.5

8.5

− 0.02

0.41

Will follow intervention manual

4.7

0.5

− 0.18

 

Intervention developed by researchers

4.7

0.5

− 0.04

 

Like new intervention types

4

0.9

0.19

 

Interventions are different than usual

1.7

0.8

− 0.06

 

4. Divergence

9

2.8

0.27

0.6

Research based interventions are not useful

1.2

0.4

0.06

 

Would not use manualized intervention

2.2

1.3

0.92

 

Current clinical practice more important

1.5

0.8

0.05

 

I know better than researchers

1.2

0.4

0.06

 

EBPAS total

18.7

9.4

0.17

0.74

  1. The total, subscale, and item mean scores range from 1 to 26. The sample size was 6