EBPAS subscales and total | Mean | SD | Average interitem correlation | α |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. Requirements | 17 | 11 | 0.22 | 0.36 |
Agency (institution regulations) required | 4.7 | 0.5 | 1 | Â |
Supervisor required | 1 | 0 | 0.22 | Â |
State (country regulation) required | 2.8 | 1.2 | 1 | Â |
2. Appeal | 26 | 5.4 | − 0.07 | 0.4 |
Intervention makes sense | 5 | 0 | 0 | Â |
intuitively appealing | 4.7 | 0.5 | − 0.46 |  |
Colleagues happy with the intervention | 4.7 | 0.5 | 0 | Â |
Enough training | 3 | 3.7 | 0.25 | Â |
3. Openness | 22.5 | 8.5 | − 0.02 | 0.41 |
Will follow intervention manual | 4.7 | 0.5 | − 0.18 |  |
Intervention developed by researchers | 4.7 | 0.5 | − 0.04 |  |
Like new intervention types | 4 | 0.9 | 0.19 | Â |
Interventions are different than usual | 1.7 | 0.8 | − 0.06 |  |
4. Divergence | 9 | 2.8 | 0.27 | 0.6 |
Research based interventions are not useful | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0.06 | Â |
Would not use manualized intervention | 2.2 | 1.3 | 0.92 | Â |
Current clinical practice more important | 1.5 | 0.8 | 0.05 | Â |
I know better than researchers | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0.06 | Â |
EBPAS total | 18.7 | 9.4 | 0.17 | 0.74 |