Skip to main content

Table 3 Results from the non-inferiority assessment of PermaNet® Dual to Interceptor® G2 and superiority to PermaNet® 3.0 against wild pyrethroid-resistant An. funestus in experimental huts in Siaya, western Kenya (with Abbott’s correction applied to mortality data and regression analysis results included)

From: Efficacy of PermaNet® Dual compared to Interceptor® G2 and PermaNet 3.0 in experimental huts in Siaya County, western Kenya

Outcome

Treatment

Total collected

Event count

%

Corrected %

Regression coefficient (SE)

Odds ratio (95% CI)

P-value

Mortality

Control

2207

817

37.0

Reference

PermaNet® 3.0

4390

2441

55.6

30.2

0.809 (0.054)

2.246 (2.021–2.495)

 < 0.001

PermaNet® Dual

4481

3029

67.6

49.2

1.304 (0.053)

3.684 (3.320–4.088)

 < 0.001

Interceptor® G2

4036

2629

65.1

44.4

1.167 (0.054)

3.212 (2.889–3.572)

 < 0.001

Blood feeding

Control

2207

926

42.0

Reference

PermaNet® 3.0

4390

423

9.6

− 1.869 (0.068)

0.154 (0.135–0.176)

 < 0.001

PermaNet® Dual

4481

671

15.0

− 1.407 (0.062)

0.245 (0.217–0.276)

 < 0.001

Interceptor® G2

4036

517

12.8

− 1.573 (0.065)

0.207 (0.183–0.235)

 < 0.001

  1. Control mortality was 37%
  2. Abbott's correction was applied to mortality data
  3. Regression coefficients and odds ratios are from blocked logistic regression models adjusting for hut, sleeper, day, and wash status